You have lineup questions. We have answers. At least we hope. Start 'Em & Sit 'Em has helped fantasy managers for years make those pressing lineup decisions. And you know what is a good decision? Starting Patrick Mahomesï»ż. But that's too obvious, so you won't see that here. Instead here are some of the most-pressing questions. And, if you can't find a player you are looking for, please check out latest NFL Fantasy lineup rankings right here.
Start 'em
Gibson has crushed it again for another week. He scored 22.5 fantasy points against the Lions on Sunday and was the RB7 after the weekend. It was his second-highest total of the season and his consistency has been the key. Heâs had at least 12 fantasy points in six of his last eight games. Four rushing touchdowns in last three games combined. But heâs also starting to see some targets out of the backfield. Heâs had at least four in four of his last six. The matchup is good against the Bengals. Theyâve allowed a lot of rushing yards, but not necessarily touchdowns. Iâll take the rushing production at this point of the season. And I think itâs finally starting to hit me that we have a running back we can count in in D.C., as if Shanahanigans has disappeared altogether. And you might counter with ï»żï»żJ.D. McKissicï»żï»ż, but the way this FT lineup is constructed, both running backs are startable.
Obviously my guy ï»żRex Burkheadï»ż scored a pair of touchdowns last week. But letâs not overlook the production Harris had. He had 55% of the snaps and set a career-high with 22 carries. Itâs going to be annoying to see Rex take a bunch of production and thatâs fine. Because getting the carries is what is going to matter the most. And heâs got a great matchup this week against the Houston Texans, who have allowed the most rushing yards to running backs this season (1,389). Look, starting a Patriots running back is kind of like inviting one of your friends over for a BBQ, knowing full well heâs going to bring along his friend who never brings beer with him but is happy to raid your cooler. Which isnât great. But weâre willing to live with it for this matchup.
I know how this looks. Again, seemingly chasing fantasy points after a somewhat surprise performance last week against the Chargers. But why would you ignore it? And why are we going to assume that any of the Dolphins running backs are going to usurp Ahmed this week? The Dolphins were committed to ï»żMyles Gaskinï»ż when he was healthy, why would they jerk around with Ahmed after he was great against the Chargers going 21-85-1? He took a bigger share of the offense last week than Gaskin did when he was the starter. I believe heâs getting a solid workload again against a defense that has allowed 24.58 fantasy points to running backs over the last month. My only hesitation is Ahmed wasnât targeted in the passing game, having only one. And the Broncos have given up a lot of production to pass-catching backs. But look at what ï»żJosh Jacobsï»ż did to them last week, and I think weâre good.
Itâs never going to be easy to figure out which Colts running back is going to get the call. And even basing this on last weekâs snaps (of which Hines led all Colts running backs with more than double the share at 56%), there is another reason why I would lean Hines in this one. The Packers have allowed two receiving touchdowns in the past four weeks to running backs on 20 receptions. They have also given up the fourth-most receiving yards to running backs (192) over that stretch. Iâm not sure if this game will be high-scoring, given the Colts defense, but figure Hines will be targeted in this one.
Are the Lions a playoff team? A squad thatâs going to do just enough to allow Matt Patricia to keep his gig for another year before they go 3-13 next season? Iâm just saying. Swift was the RB4 after Sunday with just a shade under 26 fantasy points. He was running the ball well. But more importantly, he was huge in the passing game, getting five receptions for 68 yards and a touchdown. He ran 22 routes and was clearly ahead of ï»żAdrian Petersonï»ż (even in a revenge game) and ï»żKerryon Johnsonï»ż. This is a great matchup against the Panthers who have allowed the fourth-most fantasy points to running backs this season. But I swear to goodness, Iâm just waiting for the week when Peterson inexplicably gets 30 carries because you know itâs coming.
Well, as far as revenge games go, that was pretty terrible. Duke managed just 5.4 points. Like if this was a Liam Neeson movie and dude got killed in the first five minutes after his daughter was kidnapped. But instead of being able to walk out of the theater, you just had to continue to watch it. It was something like that. But we will get in our lineups because heâs the only Texans running back who had a carry. He played 95% of the snaps. Iâll rationalize in my head that he didnât get into the passing game because of the weather. The Patriots have given up the fifth-most fantasy points to running backs over the last four weeks.
Speaking of Neeson, Iâm worried Andy Reid has spent time in his living room doing nothing but watching the Raiders win over his Chiefs earlier in the season and heâs devising ways to put 60 points up on that club this week. Reid has traditionally been one of the best coaches in the NFL coming off the bye week. He put up 40 on the Raiders in each of the last two seasons. Two years ago, Mahomes threw four touchdowns in a win over the Raiders. Last year, ï»żDarwin Thompsonï»ż and ï»żLeSean McCoyï»ż scored touchdowns (and Mahomes ran for one and passed for one). Expecting good things from the Chiefs offense, Iâd go with Clyde, considering heâs failed to reach double-digits only once this year.
Sit 'em
The Saints have allowed the second-fewest points to running backs over the past month. The team that has allowed the fewest? The Atlanta Falcons. But weâre totally starting ï»żï»żAlvin Kamaraï»żï»ż so please donât send me a message on Twitter about it. Or do, itâs all good. Gurley has been fantastic this season. Heâs a touchdown-dependent running back who continues to score touchdowns. But the Saints haven't allowed a running back to get into the end zone over the last month. And theyâve allowed just three rushing touchdowns to backs on the season.
Iâm sure Iâm the only one who does this. But instinctually, every time I see the No. 27 running I think itâs ï»żLeonard Fournetteï»ż. Maybe itâs because RoJo wore No. 25 at USC and I canât get it out of my mind. But Jones was really good against the Panthers last week. This matchup is going to be way different. The Rams have allowed the fourth-fewest points to running backs this year. If you have some other options on your roster, I would really like to use one of those players. Understand if itâs not possible.
The Broncos havenât been able to commit to the running game. They ran the ball just six times in their first 20 plays and just 14 times in the whole first half. Maybe it was because the team trailed 27-6 at halftime. But the running game just isnât cutting it. And I wouldnât be surprised to see the Broncos give ï»żPhillip Lindsayï»ż more of an opportunity this week, even though heâs also been wildly disappointing. But in general, Iâm going to avoid this Broncos backfield if at all possible.












